Uh... I am not saying this because my poster was in the late abstract section. Somehow I feel the (average) poster quality in the late abstract is surprising better than the early ones. I talked to several guys and they all felt the same way.
Is that common for late abstracts?
I don't know what the reasons are for others who have posters in late abstract. I forgot the abstract submission due, therefore could only send it as late abstract.
Although it seemed some big names were gone then, I still got tons of visiters. Actually too many that I can't even take a look at other posters (including the one besides which did similar things as mine).
I rarely saw a poster blows me away during this ASCB, and most of the good ones were (near)published. The late abstract section had the most posters I am interested, but I didn't really have a chance to see it. Really a shame.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
感想差不多
最後一天比例上來說不少有趣的東西可以看
另一個可能是這些比較早投的posters
有些我回頭去核對title, abstract內容跟我的筆記 發現不少是寫的很含糊的或是很保守的
相對來說late可能就比較清楚title和poster大概要走到啥程度了
不過我看全的poster也只有週一那一天
週二我也跟你一樣沒多少時間亂晃
把你的poster和那個asymmetrical Golgi reassembly 報告給實驗室聽後
老闆半開玩笑說
我們應該跟你合作.....:)
-Ting
Although I feel the general qualties are better, it is bad that the late abstract are in the last day since many people are gone then.
Usually the second and third days are the best for posters. You will get more serious questions and also more really interested people coming.
Post a Comment